Hispanic Family Facts: Limited English proficiency is a barrier to homeownership for U.S. Hispanics
Jan 9, 2019
Hispanic Family Facts: Limited English proficiency is a barrier to homeownership for U.S. Hispanics
Homeownership helps build families’ wealth and can promote financial stability. However, recent research from the Urban Institute finds that limited English proficiency (LEP)—limited or no ability to speak English—is a barrier to homeownership in the United States. Even after accounting for other factors that influence homeownership (e.g., race/ethnicity, income, having children), this study found that zip code areas with the highest concentrations of LEP residents had homeownership rates that were 5 percentage points lower than those with the median concentration of LEP residents.
This finding has important implications for Hispanics. In 2016, Spanish speakers made up nearly 60 percent of the 5.3 million LEP household heads in the United States. This report recommends practices that may help expand homeownership among Hispanics and other LEP populations, including: “preferred language” fields on mortgage applications, culturally responsive and Spanish-language materials, and employing more Spanish-speaking loan officers.
Suggested Citation:
National Research Center on Hispanic Children and Families. (2019). Limited English proficiency is a barrier to homeownership for U.S. Hispanics. (Hispanic Family Facts series). https://doi.org/10.59377/100u7182m
Copyright 2025 by the National Research Center on Hispanic Children & Families.
This website is supported by Grant Number 90PH0032 from the Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation within the Administration for Children and Families, a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services totaling $7.84 million with 99 percentage funded by ACF/HHS and 1 percentage funded by non-government sources. Neither the Administration for Children and Families nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse this website (including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies, and any services or tools provided). The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Administration for Children and Families and the Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation.
