Highlight text on the site to share via Twitter or e-mail!

How Well Are Early Care and Education Providers Who Serve Hispanic Children Doing on Access and Availability?

Publication number: 2017-49

Author(s): Lina Guzman; Shelby Hickman; Kimberly Turner; Lisa Gennetian

Publication date: Oct 2017

Click here to download the brief as a PDF >



Early care and education (ECE) programs serve an important developmental support for children, helping to reduce gaps in school readiness and in later educational outcomes, particularly for low-income children.1,2,3 ECE programs—and child care subsidies in particular—also represent an important employment support for parents. Given their role in supporting parents’ employment and reducing gaps in school readiness, public investment in recent decades has focused on increasing access to and the quality of ECE programs.

After decades of lagging behind, Latinoa children—including those who are low-income—are enrolling in ECE programs at rates approaching those of their low-income white peers, at least among preschool-aged children.4,5 However, we still know little about the providers of ECE programs (both formal and informal) that care for and serve Latino children. Given the increasing enrollment of Hispanic children in ECE programs, what do the programs that serve this population look like?

This brief provides a national portrait of providers serving a large proportionb of Hispanic children, focusing on characteristics that shape access to and availability of ECE programs. We find that roughly one in five providers serve a high proportion of Hispanic children (also referred to as high-Hispanic-serving), in which 25 percent or more of the children enrolled are Hispanic. Collectively, our findings suggest many ways in which providers—and home-based providers in particular—are likely responding to the needs of Hispanic families, as well as possible areas of unmet need.

About the Study

Parents consider a variety of factors when selecting an ECE program. We selected provider or program characteristics likely to influence access to and availability of care. These include such factors as the number and timing of hours of care offered and flexibility in payment for (and hours of) care. Additionally, we examined the extent to which providers have refused to care for a child either because of a lack of space or due to children’s behavioral issues. We compared these indicators of access and availability for programs that are high-Hispanic-serving with those that are low-Hispanic-serving (i.e., those programs for which less than 25 percent of the children enrolled are Hispanic).

We used data from the National Survey of Early Care and Education (2012) to examine variation among these characteristics across three provider types: (1) center-based; (2) listed, home-based (generally including those providers who care for children with whom they have no prior relationship); and (3) unlisted, home-based (generally including relatives, friends, and neighbors who provide care to children with whom they had a prior relationship). (See data box for more information.) For simplicity, we refer to each of these types as providers.

Key Findings

Our analysis reveals several interesting differences between high- and low-Hispanic-serving providers on key indicators of accessibility and flexibility. We also find that the emerging portrait of providers varies for centers versus listed, home-based providers.

In general, high-Hispanic-serving centers are on par with, or perform worse than, low-Hispanic-serving centers in 5 of the 7 indicators examined (indicators are listed and defined in Data Source and Methodology section). For example, most high-Hispanic-serving center-based providers do not offer full-time hours, care during evening and weekend hours, or flexible care hours. These findings may signal a disconnect between the availability of ECE services and the needs of Hispanic families,6 as research suggests that providers who offer a greater range of hours of care and more flexibility may be better able to meet the needs of low-income families.7,8

In contrast, listed, home-based providers may be helping to fill the gap. Our findings suggest that high-Hispanic-serving, listed, home-based providers are on par with, or perform better than, their low-Hispanic-serving peers on all seven indicators of access and availability.

More specifically, we find that:

  • Nationally, roughly 1 in 5 providers serve a high proportion of Hispanic children; this proportion ranges from 20–22 percent across the three provider types. High-Hispanic-serving providers are more likely to be in high-poverty communities and urban areas than their counterparts.
  • Just under half of high-Hispanic-serving centers offer full-time hours, a lower rate than low-Hispanic-serving centers. In contrast, most listed, home-based providers—both high- and low-Hispanic-serving—offer full-time care schedules.c
  • Few providers, whether high- or low-Hispanic-serving, offer weekend or evening hours, regardless of ECE type. However, high-Hispanic-serving, listed, home-based providers are more likely to offer these hours than their low-Hispanic-serving counterparts.
  • Most high- and low-Hispanic serving, listed, home-based providers offer flexible care hours. On the other hand, high-Hispanic-serving centers are less likely to offer flexible hours relative to low-Hispanic-serving centers. High- and low-Hispanic-serving, unlisted, home-based providers are similarly likely to offer flexible care hours.
  • Both high-Hispanic-serving centers and listed, home-based providers are less likely to charge fees for late pick-up than their low-Hispanic-serving peers. Still, just over half of high-Hispanic-serving, listed, home-based providers and 41 percent of high-Hispanic-serving centers charge a late pick-up fee. High- and low-Hispanic-serving, unlisted, home-based providers are similarly likely to charge a fee for late pick-up.
  • The majority of high-Hispanic-serving, center-based and listed, home-based providers have denied enrollment to children because of lack of available child care slots; this is also true of their counterparts who serve fewer Hispanic children. However, high-Hispanic-serving centers providers are less likely to have turned a child away because of behavioral problems than their low-Hispanic-serving counterparts.


Roughly 1 in 5 ECE providers serves a high proportion of Hispanic children. Twenty-two percent of center-based; 20 percent of listed, home-based; and 21 percent of unlisted, home-based providers serve a high proportion of Hispanic children (see Figure 1). Among high-Hispanic-serving providers, the majority (ranging from 68–83 percent across the three provider types) are in urban areas (see Table 1). Just over one-quarter of high-Hispanic-serving centers and roughly one-third of high-Hispanic-serving, listed and unlisted home-based providers are in high-poverty communities (see Table 1).



Most of the children served by high-Hispanic-serving providers are Hispanic. On average, 60 percent of children served by high-Hispanic-serving centers are Hispanic; the average is 63 percent for listed, home-based providers and 88 percent for unlisted, home-based providers (analyses available from author). In sharp contrast, low-Hispanic-serving providers serve few, if any, Hispanic children; the average Hispanic makeup of children in these settings ranges from 0 to 6 percent across the three provider types.

Less than half of high-Hispanic-serving, center-based providers offer full-time hours. Forty-seven percent of high-Hispanic-serving centers offer care Monday through Friday for at least eight hours a day, compared with 58 percent of low-Hispanic-serving centers (see Figure 2). In contrast, the vast majority (90 percent) of high-Hispanic-serving, listed, home-based providers offer full-time hours, and are as likely to do so as their low-Hispanic-serving counterparts (93 percent). Among high-Hispanic-serving, unlisted, home-based providers—those most likely to include friend and relative care—37 percent provide full-time hours, compared with 21 percent of those that serve a low proportion of Hispanic children. However, we are unable to determine whether these estimates are statistically different from each other due to sample size constraints (see Table 1).



The majority of high-Hispanic-serving providers do not provide care during evening or weekend hours (Figure 2). Ten percent of high-Hispanic-serving centers; 32 percent of listed, home-based providers; and 46 percent of unlisted, home-based providers offer care during evenings or weekends. No differences were found between high- and low-Hispanic-serving centers or unlisted, home-based providers in the provision of evening or weekend hours. However, high-Hispanic-serving, listed, home-based providers are more likely to provide care during these times than their low-Hispanic-serving peers (see Table 1).

Many high-Hispanic-serving providers offer flexible features for schedules and payment, but many also charge fees for late pick-up. In settings with a high proportion of Hispanic children, more than one-third of center-based providers (36 percent) and the vast majority of both listed and unlisted home-based providers (70 percent and 82 percent, respectively) allow parents to vary care schedules from week to week (see Figure 3). These percentages are comparable to those among low-Hispanic-serving, home-based providers, but lower relative to low-Hispanic-serving centers.

Roughly one-third of high-Hispanic serving centers and listed, home-based providers allow parents to pay for only the hours they use. Low-Hispanic-serving providers are just as likely to allowparents to pay for varying hours (see Table 1).

High-Hispanic-serving, center-based and listed, home-based providers are less likely to charge late fees than their low-Hispanic-serving counterparts. Forty-one percent of high-Hispanic-serving, center-based providers; half of listed, home-based providers (52 percent); and roughly one-quarter of unlisted, home-based (28 percent) providers charge fees to parents for picking up their children late (see Figure 3). High- and low-Hispanic-serving, unlisted, home-based providers are equally likely to charge late fees to parents (see Table 1).



The majority of high-Hispanic-serving centers and listed, home-based providers have denied care or placed a child on a waitlist because of lack of space. Roughly seven in ten high-Hispanic-serving centers; six of ten listed, home-based providers; and three of ten unlisted, home-based providers have denied enrollment to a child or placed a child on a waitlist due to lack of space (see Figure 4). High-Hispanic-serving, center-based providers are more likely (73 percent) to have turned children away due to space restraints than their low-Hispanic-serving counterparts (65 percent). However, high-Hispanic-serving, listed, home-based providers are less likely (59 percent) to have turned away a child due to space than their low-Hispanic-serving counterparts (81 percent) (see Table 1). High- and low-Hispanic-serving, unlisted, home-based providers are equally likely to have turned away a child for this reason.



Few high-Hispanic-serving providers refused to provide care to a child due to behavioral problems in the last three months. Among high-Hispanic-serving providers, 6 percent of centers; 11 percent of listed, home-based providers; and 3 percent of unlisted, home-based providers report refusing to provide care to a child because of a behavioral problem (see Figure 4). This pattern is also present among low-Hispanic-serving providers. However, low-Hispanic-serving centers are more likely to have refused to provide care due to behavioral problems than their high-Hispanic-serving counterparts (see Table 1).

Summary and Implications

This brief provides an overview of how ECE providers in the United States who serve a large proportion of Hispanic children are faring in term of indicators of access and availability—a key focus of public policy and investment aimed at reducing inequalities in ECE participation and racial/ethnic gaps in school readiness. Our findings suggest that ECE providers—and particularly listed, home-based providers—are responding to some of the unique needs of Hispanic families, and point to some areas where their needs may be unmet.

Of the seven indicators of access and availability examined for this study, high-Hispanic-serving centers perform better on two, less well on three, and are on par with their peers serving a lower proportion of Hispanic children on two indicators. This stands in sharp contrast to earlier research suggesting that high-Hispanic-serving centers performed better than, or on par with, their low-Hispanic-serving peers on 6 of 7 indicators of quality. Policies and public investments that seek to increase the accessibility and availability of ECE centers for Hispanics and other groups who have been historically under-enrolled in ECE programs may want to support centers in ways that allow them to expand their hours of operations or increase their ability to provide full-time care.

It is troubling that less than half of ECE centers that serve a high proportion of Hispanic children provide full-time care. This points to a critical area of unmet need and a barrier to increasing access to and use of center-based programs for Latino children. Granted, centers serving a low proportion of Hispanic children do not perform markedly better on this count. That is, a sizeable proportion of centers nationwide do not provide care for at least eight hours a day, Monday through Friday.12 Moreover, less than 10 percent of centers, both high- and low-Hispanic-serving, provide care during evening and weekend hours.

The dearth of full-time care and nonstandard hours is of particular concern for Hispanic families and children. The majority of children from low-income Latino households include at least one adult who is employed full-time.13 Additionally, over one-quarter of Hispanics work nonstandard hours, many of whom are employed in the service, maintenance, and agricultural industries—sectors with more variable, unpredictable work schedules.14 Listed, home-based providers—those most likely to include formal family child care—may be helping to fill this gap, as the vast majority offer full-time hours and many offer nonstandard hours. However, listed, home-based providers make up a small proportion of all home-based providers, and therefore represent a small portion of providers serving Hispanic children. Although roughly 20 percent of each provider category serves a high proportion of Hispanic children, home-based care is the most common type of care arrangement and the vast majority of home-based providers are unlisted. Thus, while the offerings of listed, home-based providers are promising in meeting the needs of families, they are likely touching few Hispanic children.

Charging fees for late pick-up or denying provision of care due to a lack of space or behavioral problems are also reflective of a provider’s flexibility and responsiveness to families. Here, there is also a mixed picture among providers who serve a high proportion of Hispanic children. On one hand, center-based providers and listed, home-based providers who serve a high proportion of Hispanic children are less likely to charge fees for late pick-up than their counterparts that serve a low proportion of Hispanic children. This can be especially beneficial to low-income parents and those with little control over their schedules. Listed, home-based providers that serve a high proportion of Hispanic children are less likely to deny enrollment due to lack of space than their low-Hispanic-serving counterparts. It is unclear whether this is due to the greater availability of listed, home-based providers in Hispanic communities, less demand for those providers serving a large proportion of Hispanic children, or greater willingness on the part of the ECE providers to accommodate families. This is a topic for exploration in future research.

Today, roughly 1 in 5 ECE providers in the United States serve a high proportion of Hispanic children. Given Hispanic residential patterns, most high-Hispanic-serving providers are located in urban areas. While the majority of U.S. Hispanics have historically gravitated toward major cities like Los Angeles, Miami, and New York, rural and suburban communities have seen a notable growth in their Hispanic populations in recent years, particularly in Southeastern and Midwestern states.15 Future research should examine whether the availability and supply of ECE providers matches the need in communities with newer populations of Hispanics, and whether the availability and need for ECE providers varies by family and community characteristics (e.g., country of heritage, parental nativity status, and language spoken in the home).

It will also be important for future research to examine the funding sources of centers and listed, home-based providers that serve a large proportion of Hispanic children, to see how funding shapes accessibility and availability. Future work could also improve our understanding of why some providers effectively reach a high proportion of Hispanic children. For example, does the racial/ethnic makeup of children in centers reflect the communities in which the providers are located, provider outreach efforts, the ease of their enrollment process, or other factors?

Public investment in ECE is intended, in part, to increase the accessibility of care for families, especially those with low incomes, to help close racial/ethnic and economic school readiness gaps. Likewise, child care subsidies are intended to support parents’ work. Flexibility in care is a key component of this support, as many parents have varying or nonstandard work schedules; thus, this angle will be important for future policy research. Additional research is also needed to explore which characteristics of accessibility and flexibility are particularly attractive to Hispanic families and can best promote their further engagement in ECE.





a In this series, we use the terms Hispanic and Latino interchangeably.
b We use 25 percent as the cut-off for defining “high-Hispanic-serving” centers for two reasons. First, 1 in 4 children (25 percent) in the United States today is Hispanic. Second, higher cut-offs would result in the inclusion only of providers serving communities with large densities of Hispanic residents. High- Hispanic-serving indicates providers for which greater than 25 percent of the children enrolled are Hispanic. Low-Hispanic-serving refers to those providers for which less than 25 percent of the children enrolled are Hispanic.
c Sample size limitations prevented us from comparing high-and low-Hispanic-serving, unlisted, home-based providers.


1Garcia, E., & Jenson, B. (2007). Language development and early education of young Hispanic children in the United States. Tempe, AZ: National Task Force on Early Childhood Education for Hispanics.

2 Crosnoe, R. (2007). Early child care and the school readiness of children from Mexican immigrant families. International Migration Review, 41, 152-181.

3 Loeb, S., Bridges, M., Bassoka, D., Fuller, B., & Rumberger, R. (2007). How much is too much? The influence of preschool centers on children’s social and cognitive development. Economics of Education Review, 26, 52-66.

4 Crosby, D., Mendez, J., Guzman, L., & López, M. (2016). Hispanic children’s participation in early care and education: Type of care by household nativity status, race/ethnicity, and child age. Bethesda, MD: National Research Center on Hispanic Children & Families. from http://www.hispanicresearchcenter.org/?publications=hispanic-childrens-participation-in-early-care-and-education-type-of-care-by-household-nativity-status-raceethnicity-and-child-age

5 Crosby, D., & Mendez, J. (2016). Hispanic children’s participation in early care and education: Amount and timing of hours by household nativity status, race/ethnicity, and child age. Bethesda, MD: National Research Center on Hispanic Children & Families. from http://www.hispanicresearchcenter.org/?publications=hispanic-childrens-participation-in-early-care-and-education-amount-and-timing-of-hours-by-household-nativity-status-raceethnicity-and-child-age

6 Crosby, D., Mendez, J. L., Guzman, L., & Lopez, M. (2017). A national snapshot of low-income Hispanic children’s participation in early care and education. Washington, D.C.: National Research Center on Hispanic Children & Families.

7 Chaudry, A., Pedroza, J. M., Sandstrom, H., Danziger, A., Grosz, M., Scott, M., et al. (2011). Child care choices of low-income working families. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. from http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/27331/412343-Child-Care-Choices-of-Low-Income-Working-Families.PDF

8 Henly, J. R., & Lambert, S. (2005). Nonstandard Work and Child-Care Needs of Low-Income Parents. In L. M. C. S. M. Bianchi, & B. R. King (Ed.), Work, family, health, and well-being (pp. 473-492). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

9 NSECE Project Team. (2012). National Survey of Early Care and Education (NSECE), 2012. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. from http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35519.v2

10 National Survey of Early Care and Education Project Team. (2013). Number and characteristics of early care and education (ECE) teachers and caregivers: Initial findings from the National Survey of Early Care and Education (NSECE). Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

11 Fry, R., Lopez, M.H. (2012). Hispanic student enrollments reach new highs in 2011. Washington, DC: Pew Research Hispanic Center. Retrieved April 26, 2013, from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2012/08/20/hispanic-student-enrollments-reach-new-highs-in-2011/

12 National Survey of Early Care and Education Project Team. (2015). Fact sheet: Provision of early care and education during non-standard hours. Washington, D.C.: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/research/project/national-survey-of-early-care-andeducation-nsece-2010-2014

13 Turner, K., Guzman, L., Wildsmith, E., & Scott, M. (2015). The complex and varied households of low-income Hispanic children. Bethesda, MD: National Research Center on Hispanic Children & Families. from http://www.hispanicresearchcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/2015-04ComplexHouseholdsLowIncomeHispanic.pdf

14 Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). Hispanics and Latinos in industries and occupations. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor. from http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2015/hispanics-and-latinos-in-industries-and-occupations.htm

15 Brown, A., & Lopez, M. H. (2013). Mapping the Latino population by state, county and city. Washington, D.C.: Pew Hispanic Center. from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2013/08/29/mapping-the-latino-population-by-state-county-and-city/